== స్థూల విస్తృతాభిప్రాయం ==
Administrators necessarily must use their best judgment, attempting to be as impartial as is possible for a fallible human, to determine when [[rough consensus]] has been reached. For example, administrators can disregard opinions and comments if they feel that there is strong evidence that they were not made in [[వికీపీడియా:good faith|good faith]]. Such "bad faith" opinions include those being made by [[వికీపీడియా:sock puppet|sock puppets]], being made anonymously, or being made using a new userid whose only edits are to the article in question and the voting on that article. If a rough consensus holds that the nomination was made in bad faith, the page may be [[వికీపీడియా:Speedy keep|speedily kept]].
Consensus is not determined by counting heads, but by looking at strength of argument, and underlying policy (if any). Arguments that contradict policy, are based on opinion rather than fact, or are logically fallacious, are frequently discounted. For instance, if someone finds the entire page to be a copyright violation, a page is always deleted. If an argument for deletion is that the page lacks sources, but an editor adds the missing references, said argument is no longer relevant.
Wikipedia policy, which requires that articles and information be [[WP:V|verifiable]], avoid being [[WP:NOR|original research]], not [[WP:CP|violate copyright]], and be written from a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] is not negotiable, and cannot be superseded by any other guidelines or by editors' consensus. A closing admin must determine whether any article violates policy, and where it is very unlikely that an article on the topic can exist without breaching policy, it must be respected above individual opinions.
== పేజీలను తొలగించడం గురించి ==