వికీపీడియా:మౌలిక పరిశోధనలు నిషిద్ధం: కూర్పుల మధ్య తేడాలు

==నిర్వచనం==

గతంలో ఏ విశ్వసనీయ వనరులోనూ ప్రచురించబడని వ్యాసాన్ని వికీపీడియాలో మౌలిక పరిశోధనా వ్యాసం అంటారు. ఇంతకు ముందు ప్రచురితం కాని వాదనలు, చర్చలు, భావనలు, డేటా, ఆలోచనలు, ప్రకటనలు, సిద్ధాంతాలు, ఇప్పటికే ప్రచురితమైన విషయాలపై సాగిన కొత్త విషయాలతో కూడిన పరిశోధనాత్మక విశ్లేషణ ఈ కోవలోకి వస్తాయి.

 

{{nutshell|Wikipedia does [[WP:NOT|not]] publish original thought: all material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a [[WP:V|reliable, published source]]. | Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position not clearly advanced by the sources.}}

If you have questions about particular examples of OR, or you need help because someone has accused you of posting OR, please see the [[Wikipedia:No original research/noticeboard|No original research noticeboard]] ([[WP:NORN]]).

 

Research that consists of collecting and organizing material from existing sources within the provisions of this and other content policies is encouraged: this is "source-based research", and it is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia. Take care, however, not to go beyond what is expressed in the sources or to use them in ways inconsistent with the intent of the source, such as using material out of context. In short, '''stick to the sources'''.

 

{{main|Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources}} {{see also|Wikipedia:Reliable sources|Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Reliable_sources}}

Any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by a reliable source. "Original research" is material for which no reliable source can be found. The only way you can show that your edit is not original research is to produce a reliable published source that contains that material. Even with well-sourced material, however, if you use it out of context or to advance a position not '''directly and explicitly''' supported by the source you are also engaged in original research; see [[WP:SYN|below]].

In general the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level textbooks; magazines, journals, and books published by respected publishing houses; and mainstream newspapers. As a rule of thumb, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication. Material that is self-published, whether on paper or online, is generally not regarded as reliable, but see [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published sources (online and paper)|this section of Verifiability]] for exceptions.

 

 

Information in an article must be [[WP:V|verifiable]] in the references cited. Article statements generally should not rely on unclear or inconsistent passages nor on passing comments. Passages open to interpretation should be precisely cited or avoided. A summary of extensive discussion should reflect the conclusions of the source's author(s). Drawing conclusions not evident in the reference is original research regardless of the type of source. It is important that references be cited in context and on topic.

 

{{see also|Wikipedia:Attribution#Primary and secondary sources}}

<span id="PSTS" />{{policy shortcut|WP:PSTS}}