సహాయం:వికీ మార్కప్‌తో మూలాలివ్వడం గురించి పరిచయం/4: కూర్పుల మధ్య తేడాలు

దిద్దుబాటు సారాంశం లేదు
Reverted 1 edit by AshokPratapYadav (talk): Please do not post your CV here. (TW)
పంక్తి 1:
{{Help intro frame top}}
[[File:Ashokpratapyadav.jpg|thumbnail|Ashok pratap yadav]]
<!-- TABS -->
'''[https://www.facebook.com/ashokpratapyadav Ashok pratap yadav]''' is the student of software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence at the Punjab Technical University.
{{Help:Introduction to referencing/tabs|This=4}}
|style="padding: 2em;" |
<!-- CONTENT -->
{{Shortcut|WP:INTREF4}}
 
[[File:Question book-new.svg|left|100px]]
Ashok is belong to phulwariya Gopalganj and- “he like the dreams of the future better than the history of the past.”
Now you know ''how'' to add sources to an article, but ''which'' sources should you use? Wikipedia articles require '''reliable, published sources''' that directly support the information presented in the article.
 
The word "source" in Wikipedia has three meanings: the work itself (for example, a document, article, paper, or book), the creator of the work (for example, the writer), and the publisher of the work (for example, Cambridge University Press). All three can affect reliability.
<big>PROFESSIONAL SKILLS</big> '''Computer programming'''
 
As a general rule, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing of a publication, the more reliable it is. Academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources. Other reliable sources include university textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and mainstream newspapers. (<small>Be aware that some news organisations and magazines, such as CNN's [[iReport]], host "blogs" and user-written articles on their websites. These may be reliable if they are written by the publisher's professional writers, but posts by readers are not usually considered reliable sources.</small>)
<big>EDUCATION</big>;
'''Co-Operative High School'''
2006 to 2009 (7th to 10th)· Gopalganj, India
 
'''Self-published media''', where the author and publisher are the same, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs and tweets, are largely '''not''' acceptable as sources. However, if an author is an established expert with a previous record of third-party publications on a topic, their self-published work ''may'' be considered reliable for that topic, though third-party publications are still preferable.
'''Gopeshwar College'''
2009 to 2011 · Chemistry · Physics · Mathematics · Hathua, India
I.SC (math)
 
Whether a source is usable also depends on context. Bear in mind that sources that are reliable for some material are not reliable for other material. You should always try to find the best possible source for the information you have. For information about '''living people''', only the most reliable sources should be used. On the other hand, self-published sources can ''sometimes'' be used as sources of information about themselves.
'''Punjab Technical University'''
2011 to 2014 · Software Engineering · Jalandhar, India
 
These are general guidelines, but the topic of reliable sources is a complicated one which it is impossible to fully cover here. You can find more information at [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] and at [[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources]].
<big>contact info</big>
 
{{Help intro next| target = Help:Introduction to referencing/5}}
website: http://www.ashokpratapyadav.blogspot.in/
|}
google+ : https://plus.google.com/+Ashokpratapyadav143
facebook : https://www.facebook.com/ashokpratapyadav
 
[[Category:Wikipedia quick introductions]]