వికీపీడియా

సహాయం:ఇక్కడికి లింకున్న పేజీలు: కూర్పుల మధ్య తేడాలు

చరిత్రలో దిద్దుబాట్లను ఎంపిక చేసుకుంటూ తేడాలు చూడండి
← మునుపటి తేడా
Content deleted Content added
విజువల్వికీటెక్స్ట్
చి బాటు చేసిన మార్పు: ఆంగ్ల నేంస్పేసు పేర్లు తెలుగులోకి మార్పు
ఆంగ్లభాగ తొలగింపు
 
పంక్తి 1:
{{అనువాదము}}
వికీపీడియాలోని ప్రతి పేజీకి "'''ఇక్కడికి లింకున్న పేజీలు'''" అనే లింకు ఉంటుంది.
==స్థూలంగా==
Line 18 ⟶ 17:
==పరిమితి==
ఇక్కడికి లింకున్న పేజీల జాబితాలో ఉపపేజీలు కనిపించవు.
 
==దారిమార్పులు==
The backlinks feature shows which backlinks are redirects.
 
The backlinks of the redirect are also shown, and if they include a redirect, the backlinks of that also (not more).
 
This makes it a useful tool for finding double redirects, which do not work, and, except in special applications (see below) can better be replaced by redirects to the final target.
 
==Cases of inclusion==
Whether there is a link from A to C is relevant for backlinks as well as Related changes. If C does not exist, only backlinks are applicable.
 
*Inclusion is listed as such.
*A link from A to C counts as such even if the link is not explicit in the wikitext of A, but due to the inclusion of B, which links to C.
*If A calls B and there is a link in B to C within noinclude tags then B links to C, but A does not.
*If A calls B and there is a link in B to C within includeonly tags then A links to C, but B does not.
*If A calls B and B links to a page C that depends on a variable or parameter, then:
**The question whether A links to C depends on the value of the variable on page A, or the parameter with which A calls B.
**The question whether B links to C depends on the value of the variable on page B; in the case of a parameter, considered from page B, the page may e.g. not call a valid page name (because it calls one with a name with braces), so B does not link to any valid C, or a name depending on the default value of the parameter.
 
Thus a link from A to C may be due to the inclusion of B, even when B, considered by itself, does not link to C. Thus, to find out what templates cause pages to link to C, it is not sufficient to check for templates in the backlinks of C.
 
If some pages link to C due to the inclusion of B, it is more convenient if B is in the list of backlinks of C. One can assure this by putting an appropriate example of usage of B on page B, inside noinclude tags (B includes B, but without recursion).
 
Otherwise a page like B, which causes pages which include B to link to C, can only be found by looking for pages which directly or indirectly are included in these backlink pages of C.
 
Examples:
*[[మూస:H:f]] calls Template:h:f <nowiki>{{</nowiki>NAMESPACE}}. Considered by itself that is the unused Template:H:f Template [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Recentchangeslinked&target=Template:H:f&days=3000&limit=50], [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Template%3AH%3Af_Template]
*This page '''Help:What links here''' links through [[మూస:H:f]] to [[మూస:H:f Help]] [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Recentchangeslinked&target=Help:What%20links%20here&days=3000&limit=500], [http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Whatlinkshere&target=Template%3AH%3Af_Help]. This page is therefore a backlink of the latter, but Template:H:f is not listed.
 
Even without a template name depending on a variable or parameter, if page A links to page C due to the inclusion of template B1 which redirects to B2, which links to C, A is in the list of backlinks of C but B1 is not.
 
Summarizing, for the purpose of backlinks and Related changes, A links to C if there is, in that order, a chain of template calls, a single redirect, template calls, a single redirect, etc., template calls, and a chain of redirects.
 
If a page is conditionally embedded through #if, #ifeq, #ifexist, #ifexpr, or #switch, it is counted as embedded, even if the condition is not fulfilled
 
If on page A the name of an embedded page is time-dependent, e.g. <nowiki>{{abc{{CURRENTDOW}}}}</nowiki>, currently giving {{abc{{CURRENTDOW}}}}, the "What links here" list of one of the possibly embedded pages shows page A: the current one, or, depending on caching issues, perhaps an older one.
 
Thus, although the same functionality is obtained with <nowiki>{{#switch:{{CURRENTDOW}}|0={{abc0}}|1={{abc1}}|..}}</nowiki>, these methods differ in whether the seven templates all count as embedded, or just one.
 
In the case of an image, using it in a page is listed in the third section of the image description page, but not in "What links here" of that page
 
==Order; query==
Comparison with [[Query#backlinks]] and [[Query#embeddedin]]:
 
Compare [[Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:T]] with
http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/query.php?what=backlinks|embeddedin&titles=template:t&bllimit=500&eilimit=500&blfilter=all&eifilter=all
 
Differences demonstrated:
*Query sorts by function first (backlinks and inclusions), then by [[page id]], "what links here" sorts by page id.
*Query distinguishes between B being only included in A, and B also being linked from A.
*Query does not indicate which backlinks are redirects, and does not include ''their'' backlinks.
*Query provides page ids.
 
Another difference:
*Query allows restriction to a specified namespace.
 
==In-page list of backlinks==
With the extension [[Semantic MediaWiki]] (SMW) links are categorized by specifying relations. For a given relation the backlinks of a page can be produced in-page. A series of queries, one for each relation (which seems cumbersome but can be put in a template like [http://wiki.ontoworld.org/wiki/Template:Ask]), provides an in-page list of backlinks sorted by relation. Moreover, forward links and attributes of the resulting pages can also be provided, and also backlinks of backlinks.
 
==See also==
*[[సహాయము:Category#Comparison_with_.22What_links_here.22|Categories - Comparison with "What links here?"]]
"https://te.wikipedia.org/wiki/సహాయం:ఇక్కడికి_లింకున్న_పేజీలు" నుండి వెలికితీశారు