వికీపీడియా:Possibly unfree files/2013 October 15
October 15
మార్చు
- Although this is claimed as Public Domain I can't find a release on the source listed. (was listed as F11 but uploader contested.) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:34, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Despite claims, I'm not sure this is below TOO. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:55, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Anguilla Air Services.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a logo above the threshold of originality. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:01, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- This is a logo above the threshold of originality. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:01, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Peon - Ek Chaprasi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is poster artwork, and not necessarily the uploader's to re-license. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:11, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Emblem Of TDMC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a logo above TOO and not necessarily the uploaders to re-license. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Perla Airlines.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo artwork above TOO, not necessarily uploaders to re-license Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:21, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Mar antia radar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Low-quality web-size action shot, which I wouldn't expect if the user had taken it himself. Also see [1] for proof it was published on the web prior to being uploaded here. Mackensen (talk) 12:36, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Logo artwork, not necessarily uploaders to re-license Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- I can't find the source URL, but note the banner text along the left crediting the image to "Pollyestudios". Many of the uploader's images have been flagged as copyvios. Mackensen (talk) 13:26, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- It says that the "Photo is on file at the Joe E. White Library" which seems to contradict the claim that it is own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 14:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Appears to be an upscaled copy of the photo here. Unlikely own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 14:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:US House of Representatives Speaker Carl Albert and White.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says that "The photo resides at the Carl Albert State College; Joe E. White Library" which suggests that the uploader obtained a copy from the archive instead of taking it himself. Stefan2 (talk) 14:26, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Comment As an employee of a congressional papers archive, I can assure you that there's a very high chance that this was taken by a House of Representatives official photographer or by a House staff member, and either of those could only produce {{PD-Congress}} images. Lacking proof of this, we can't keep the image, but it's more likely than not to be PD-Congress. Nyttend (talk) 00:44, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Uploader asked for permission to insert the image on Wikipedia, so the permission only seems to be for Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:2099SimplexFireLever.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This can only be used provided that undisclosed restrictions are respected. As we don't know what the restrictions are, we don't know whether we are following them or not. Stefan2 (talk) 14:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:2dinara.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:An adelaide sunrise.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Berezovo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Illustration of unknown origin. The illustration was probably not created by the linked museum. Stefan2 (talk) 15:16, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- No freedom of panorama for text in Canada. Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Permission is nonderivative and only applies to the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 15:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Age sequence.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The uploader removed all source and licensing information. I don't know if that means that the information is wrong. Stefan2 (talk) 19:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Chefham2004.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The image can only be used "provided that it furthers the aims of the Lynton & Barnstaple Railway". This is a non-free restriction. Stefan2 (talk) 19:51, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Chevaline2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Chewing-coca.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The permission only allows the uploader to use the image, but it doesn't allow anyone else to use it. Stefan2 (talk) 19:53, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:CityGreenCover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:ClamBake.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The permission is only for "Critics of the Church of Scientology (CoS), including Wikipedia" and it is unclear if it allows derivative works. Stefan2 (talk) 19:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. It's a logo being used as a logo. Nothing wrong with using this image under a claim of fair use. Nyttend (talk) 00:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Combined asymmetry.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Very unclear permission statement. The author requests people to mention the source if the image is posted somewhere, but it isn't clear if it is allowed to post the image there in the first place. The source is unidentified, so we are not indicating the source ourselves. Also unclear if derivative works are allowed. Stefan2 (talk) 20:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Construction sites acp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unclear if derivative works are allowed. Permission is only for the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 20:27, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:CurvedRaceCattleCorral.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Nonderivative permission. Stefan2 (talk) 20:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Question due to the image's age. In 2004, did we permit images that didn't explicitly permit DWs? If so, this should be kept because we grandfather images that were acceptable when uploaded. Note that Stefan's not entirely accurate here: this is in a grey area that neither permits nor prohibits DWs. I agree that it's not sufficient under current standards, but it shouldn't entirely be treated like a CC-by-nd license that expressly prohibits DWs, and who knows but that we might have allowed this kind of permission in 2004. Nyttend (talk) 00:35, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- The rules for old files are explained at Commons:COM:GOF and those rules are based on the history of some page on Commons. I don't know whether English Wikipedia uses the same rules as Commons. According to Commons, "Prior to 8 January 2006, it was only required that the file was properly licensed and attributed, with no specific statement of permission being required on the image page." However, in this case, the permission from the copyright holder is stated on the file information page, so I would assume that the permission is exactly as stated. Between 8 January and 15 March 2006, the uploaders were required to quote the permission e-mail on the file information page, which is essentially what the uploader has done here, although the file was uploaded earlier.
- According to Twinkle's documentation for WP:CSD#F3, {{db-f3}} doesn't apply to images uploaded prior to 19 May 2005, but this date isn't mentioned at WP:CSD#F3, so maybe it is obsolete information. On that date, User:Jimbo Wales sent this e-mail to a mailing list, stating that non-commercial and "by permission only" licences no longer are accepted, and this is probably why Twinkle mentions that date. According to that e-mail, we still don't want earlier files under those licences, so I would still assume that such files are deleted, although they might need a deletion discussion. Curiously, the e-mail doesn't mention nonderivative licences at all.
- The permission allows people to "copy" the image, which normally means unaltered copies only. The right to make derivative works normally has to be given explicitly. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:21, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Cvetkovci01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This can only be used provided that undisclosed restrictions are respected. As we don't know what the restrictions are, we don't know whether we are following them or not. Stefan2 (talk) 20:30, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Cvetkovci02.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This can only be used provided that undisclosed restrictions are respected. As we don't know what the restrictions are, we don't know whether we are following them or not. Stefan2 (talk) 20:30, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The permissions tag was added by an IP address (the uploader never added any license template whatsoever), so we don't know that the uploader agreed with this permissions tag. Nyttend (talk) 00:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Permission is non-commercial only. History of the photo before it ended up in the archive unknown, so we don't know whether {{PD-FLGov}} applies or not. Stefan2 (talk) 20:33, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:DanofJOClive.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Day-of-forgiveness.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It is very unlikely that a news agency would approve us to use the image under {{copyrighted free use provided that}}. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Davidgilmour.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Document html 47f1ed1b.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- There are two permissions: one which is only for "academic, teaching and non-commercial purposes" and one which only allows the uploader to use the image in the Wikipedia article. Both are insufficient. Not sure if it is eligible for copyright in the first place. Stefan2 (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Neither permission is sufficient, and I don't see how a proper fair use justification could be given, so the only way we can include this is if it be {{PD-ineligible}}. Some complicated images are PD-ineligible, e.g. {{PD-chem}} images, because they follow rigid patterns that prohibit originality. However, the six sub-images don't appear to me to follow such a rigid pattern, so they're likely copyrightable. On top of that, the creator exhibited some originality in arranging the images as he did, and what's more, the text under the images is clearly copyrightable. Nyttend (talk) 00:33, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Dogs6CCcopy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It seems that it is prohibited to distribute this image for a fee. In that case, the image is unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 20:50, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Comment Well unless you plan to print out Wikipedia and sell it for a fee I fail to see how the image copyright would affect us at all. 96.49.167.211 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Enrique Bolaños.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Permission appears to be noncommercial and nonderivative. Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Evans rodney a.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The so-called "permission" only seems to mean that the charges for copyright violation become smaller if the source is attributed. Also unclear if derivative works are permitted. Stefan2 (talk) 21:14, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:GeraldBouey.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:GMTpress.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:GordonThiessen.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:JohnCrow.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:GrahamTowers.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Greatinside.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Source deleted from Hebrew Wikipedia stating "בעייתי" which Google translates as "problematic". This may mean that there are copyright issues with the file. Stefan2 (talk) 21:42, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Grizlov 139.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I find it very unlikely that a news agency would permit us to use the image under the specified licence. Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Hallin Fell.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Permission is only for "you" and it is unclear whether derivative works are permitted or not. Stefan2 (talk) 21:45, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Per [2] this is probably the work of the Brazilian Air Force and not the uploader. Mackensen (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Irvingtonchurch2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This can only be used provided that undisclosed restrictions are followed. As we don't know what the restrictions are, we don't know whether we are following them or not. Stefan2 (talk) 22:03, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Two images in one.
- 2012 image: copyright status unknown.
- 2007 image: OTRS ticket needed. Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Karkemish 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Karkemish 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Ico.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Copy here (page 2) appears to predate Wikipedia. "Prepared by Yakama Nation In cooperation with Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife". At least Yakama Nation doesn't seem to make {{PD-USGov}} material. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:LC explosion panic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- According to a previous version of the file information page, the uploader received the file by e-mail from the author, suggesting that the uploader isn't the author. Stefan2 (talk) 22:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
I had recieved
- This is not an "unfree" file this was created by the group member as part of a project to improve certain Wikipedia pages. This is produced by me, the editors and groups property.
- I would be more than happy to edit, confirm or provide evidence that this diagram is a collaborative effort of our group, as part of out group assignment. However you must tell me the steps in order to remedy this situation.
- I an new to Wikipedia and unfamiliar with copyright protection laws, you cannot expect me to read the article and understand it right away.
DryMartini99 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Comment from an uninvolved third party
I believe DryMartini has uploaded this file and released it under a GFDL license in good faith. As he has stated (perhaps somewhat confusedly), this image was created as part of a university group assignment. He is one of the co-authors of the article and accompanying diagrams, and so should be free to release the file under the given license. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:30, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- Do all co-authors need to give permission? This might depend on the country of origin of the file. Just to be on the safe side, it might be better if everyone in the group follows the instructions at WP:CONSENT... --Stefan2 (talk) 11:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:Lsa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Insufficient licence as you need to contact an e-mail address before you can use the photo. Stefan2 (talk) 22:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- File:GenoCAD data model.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
