వికీపీడియా:పేజీ సంరక్షణ కొరకు అభ్యర్థనలు
 | ఈ వ్యాసాన్ని పూర్తిగా అనువదించి, తరువాత ఈ మూసను తీసివేయండి. అనువాదం చేయాల్సిన వ్యాస భాగం ఒకవేళ ప్రధాన పేరుబరిలో వున్నట్లయితే పాఠ్యం సవరించు నొక్కినప్పుడు కనబడవచ్చు. అనువాదం పూర్తయినంతవరకు ఎర్రలింకులు లేకుండా చూడాలంటే ప్రస్తుత ఆంగ్ల కూర్పుని, భాషల లింకుల ద్వారా చూడండి(అనువాదకులకు వనరులు) |
| పేజీ సంరక్షణ కొరకు అభ్యర్థనలు | ||
|---|---|---|
|
This page is for requesting that a page, file or template be fully protected, create protected (salted), extended confirmed protected, semi-protected, added to pending changes, move-protected, template protected, upload protected (file-specific), or unprotected. Please read the protection policy for details. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used only to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop page-move wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, the protection is listed in the page history and logs with a short description indicating why it was protected, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. Further discussion should take place on the Talk page of the article. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins do not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
If you would like to request to have a page protected, have a page's existing protection level lowered or raised, or would like to submit an edit request for a protected page, please follow these steps (note: if you enable the Twinkle gadget for your Wikipedia account, this process can be largely automated for you):
=== [[Example Article Name]] ===
* {{pagelinks|Example Article Name}}
'''Semi-protection:''' High level of IP vandalism. ~~~~
=== [[Template:Example Template Name]] ===
* {{pagelinks|Template:Example Template Name}}
'''Reduction in protection level:''' From full protection to template editor protection. ~~~~
=== Short descriptive header ===
* {{pagelinks|Wikipedia:Example Page Name 1}}
* {{pagelinks|Wikipedia:Example Page Name 2}}
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' High level of IP vandalism. ~~~~
| ||
Current requests for increase in protection level
మార్చుPlace requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the rolling archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: For the past month, the article has seen the same inappropriate addition from new and anonymous editors. As I explained in the edit summaries, one source given is unreliable and self-published, while the others do not verify the content being added. The main issue then, is that these editors (or editor) is drawing their own conclusions about a historical event based on sources discussing contemporary politics. CentreLeftRight ✉ 18:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @CentreLeftRight: You needs to warn Tensa Ulquiorra for persistently unsourced or poorly sourced content. I believe the user is not warned yet when you requesting it to be protected. 36.77.74.149 (talk) 20:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- I've left an explanation on their talk page, but I'm pretty sure Tensa Ulquiorra, Aimlesshotgun420, 122.163.30.214, 223.235.116.191, and 2601:200:C001:B630:A01B:AD9D:64DF:4D37 are all the same person, so I don't know what's the point of doing so repeatedly. I also strongly believe that the new users I just listed are sockpuppets of Nittin Das, considering their sockpuppet Sangheili spartan was the first to make the addition. CentreLeftRight ✉ 21:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. An WP:SPI is probably due. El_C 17:53, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Temporary full-protection: Article is in technical move problem made by Script error: No such module "user".. User is keeping on reverting edits without proper history. Article needs to be deleted to be fixed with the proper history. Please fix this issue by protecting or deleting. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 12:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Anthony Appleyard. GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @GorillaWarfare: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Requesting semi-protection for Emishi because of unexplained repeated blanking of a particular section. HelenDegenerate (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Note: Edit war over unsourced content? Looks like a content dispute. Someone else please confirm. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)- It really isn't unexplained. The content remover has been quite articulate. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:24, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Regardless of whether this request accurately reflects what's happening on the page, the edit war there has got to stop. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – also, addition of unsourced content in a FA. Wretchskull (talk) 21:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: A single user, JimmyCrow, has continued to vandalize this article by reverting every attempt to clean the page of their original vandalism. As you can see in the article's edit history, this user continuously changes language and date formats from the published standards of the article. I requested semi-protection for the article yesterday due to several random IPs making the exact same vandalism, but this user is still able to vandalize the page and has continued to make the same vandalism as the IPs, which suggests sockpuppetry. I don't know if this user is an extended confirmed editor, but I am out of ideas at this point. I have posted a vandalism notice on their talk page three times now—most recently on March 19—but the user simply blanks their talk page and copies the exact same warning on my talk page (I deleted the vandalism, so please check the edit history). Nothing has worked, and the vandalism continues to happen. Any help would be appreciated. Anwegmann (talk) 23:15, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Anwegmann: This is a content dispute and edit warring. So it needs to be reported via ANEW or AIV. 36.69.52.139 (talk) 23:46, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – He just scored a goal as a goalkeeper and is getting a lot of media coverage, many IPs making disruptive edits with no source & such. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Semi-protected --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. lomrjyo(About × contribs) 23:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Vandalism via IP. CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:49, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:02, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Daniuu (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
మార్చుBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Only post below if you receive no (favourable) reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the rolling archive if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reduction in protection level: From semi protection to pending changes protection. My understanding is that this would allow all people to make changes but would still maintain a level of protection against vandalism etc. for this controversial crossbencher. This kind of protection has been in use on other politicians' pages such as Joe Hockey's for years with success. Thank you for your consideration. 159.196.100.171 (talk) 21:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping to @Orderinchaos: (CC) Tbhotch™ 06:56, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Unprotect/Remove PC protection: The article was placed under Pending Changes protection on September 14, 2013, with no expiration date specified, by administrator User:Mark Arsten. Per the WP:PCPP policy, "indefinite PC protection should be used only in cases of severe long-term disruption", which is not the case here. In February-March there have been only a couple of unconstructive edits (and even those weren't really vandalism as such). I don't think that the article needs continued protection of any kind, and certainly not indefinite protection. User:Mark Arsten has been contacted about the issue back in September 2020 but did not reply, see User talk:Mark Arsten#David Blaine. He has not edited Wikipedia since August 20, 2020. Thanks, Nsk92 (talk) 22:12, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
మార్చుIdeally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{request edit}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Create a level 3 header with a link to the article in question, then a {{pagelinks}} template and then the reason.
Handled requests
మార్చుA rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.